DOJ Negotiates $50 Million Settlement with Flynn Over FBI Lies

UPDATE: The Department of Justice (DOJ) is in urgent negotiations for a potential $50 million settlement with Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser who pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI regarding his communications with Russia. This shocking development could see taxpayers footing the bill for Flynn’s claims of wrongful prosecution, as reported by Bloomberg.

Flynn, who was pardoned by Donald Trump in late 2020, argues that his life was shattered by “rogue FBI actors” orchestrating a politically motivated attack. His attorney, Jesse Binnall, states in court documents that the prosecution drained Flynn both financially and emotionally, alleging that it was part of a larger “soft coup” against Trump. Flynn’s claims highlight a growing trend where former Trump allies seek accountability and financial restitution from the government.

The implications of this settlement are profound. If finalized, it not only validates Flynn’s claims but could also set a precedent for other Trump associates and allies to pursue similar compensation. Binnall is also representing Stefan Passantino, a former senior White House lawyer, who is negotiating a settlement of his own, asserting that his reputation was damaged by the January 6 Committee’s actions.

Passantino’s claims arise from his tenure representing Cassidy Hutchinson, a key witness who later provided damaging testimony against Trump. He alleges that members of the Committee leaked confidential information, severely impacting his career and finances. As both Flynn and Passantino seek redress, the negotiations represent a significant shift in the DOJ’s approach under the Biden administration, moving from a defensive posture to one of potential settlement.

This evolving scenario comes as the DOJ faces backlash for its handling of cases involving January 6 defendants, including a group affiliated with the Proud Boys seeking over $100 million for what they label a “malicious” prosecution. A federal judge has yet to rule on the DOJ’s motion to dismiss this case.

The DOJ’s negotiations with Flynn and Passantino are indicative of a broader strategy where financial relief is being considered for Trump allies, raising questions about the administration’s priorities. As these talks unfold, the ramifications for federal legal proceedings and the handling of high-profile political figures are significant.

Stay tuned for further updates as this story develops, with implications that could reshape the political landscape and the accountability of government actions against individuals in the political arena.