Connect with us

Science

Chang’e-6 Returns Unique Lunar Samples Showing Cohesive Behavior

editorial

Published

on

China’s Chang’e-6 mission has successfully returned lunar samples from the far side of the Moon, revealing unique characteristics that could reshape our understanding of lunar geology. On June 25, 2024, the mission retrieved approximately 1,935.3 grams of soil from the South Pole–Aitken Basin, the largest and oldest impact structure on the Moon. This marks a significant addition to the scientific community, as it provides the first samples from an area that has remained largely unexplored.

The analysis of these samples, conducted by a team led by Prof. Qi Shengwen from the Institute of Geology and Geophysics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, indicates that the lunar soil exhibits notably cohesive behavior. According to Hu Hao, chief designer of the Chang’e-6 mission, the returned samples appear “slightly more viscous and somewhat clumpier” compared to the finer materials gathered during the Chang’e-5 mission.

Understanding Cohesion in Lunar Soil

To quantify the cohesiveness of the Chang’e-6 samples, researchers carried out fixed-funnel and rotating-drum experiments to assess the angle of repose, a critical parameter that reflects how easily granular materials can flow. The findings, published in Nature Astronomy, revealed that the angle of repose for Chang’e-6 soil is significantly higher than that of samples from the Moon’s near side. This suggests that the far-side soil behaves more like cohesive materials.

Further analysis determined that magnetic and cementation effects were not responsible for this elevated angle. The samples contained only trace amounts of magnetic minerals and no clay minerals. Instead, the high cohesion is attributed to three key interparticle forces: friction, van der Waals forces, and electrostatic forces. The friction force, which is influenced by the roughness of particle surfaces, plays a part, but the contributions of van der Waals and electrostatic forces become more pronounced as particle sizes decrease.

Using the D60 metric, which measures the particle diameter at which 60% of the sample is finer, researchers identified a critical size threshold of approximately 100 micrometers. Below this threshold, non-clay mineral particles in the lunar soil begin to demonstrate cohesive behavior. The Chang’e-6 samples had a D60 of just 48.4 micrometers, indicating they are significantly finer and more irregular in shape than near-side soils, with lower particle sphericity.

Implications for Lunar Geology

The unusual morphology of the Chang’e-6 samples has raised questions about the geological processes at work on the far side of the Moon. Prof. Qi noted that, “Finer particles are typically more spherical. Despite being fine-grained, Chang’e-6 soil displays more complex particle morphologies.” This complexity may be influenced by two factors: a higher content of feldspar, approximately 32.6%, which is prone to fragmentation, and more intense space weathering on the Moon’s far side.

The study provides a systematic explanation of the cohesive behavior of lunar soil from a granular mechanics perspective. As scientists continue to analyze the implications of these findings, they may uncover new insights into the physical properties of far-side regolith. This research not only enhances our understanding of the Moon’s history but also lays the groundwork for future lunar exploration and potential resource utilization.

This groundbreaking work exemplifies the importance of sample-return missions in bridging the gap between orbital remote sensing and ground-truth measurements. With the successful return of lunar samples, researchers are now better equipped to explore the Moon’s geological evolution and unique characteristics, paving the way for advancements in planetary science.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.