Conservative Lawyers Call Hegseth’s Comments “Admission of Guilt”

BREAKING: In a stunning turn of events, conservative lawyers are labeling remarks made by Pete Hegseth as an “admission of guilt” amid escalating concerns over a major scandal involving military operations. Late Saturday night, former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy publicly criticized Hegseth’s defense regarding the killing of two survivors from controversial drug vessel bombings, stating that his rationale “makes no legal sense.”

The Washington Post reported on this bombshell story, revealing that Hegseth allegedly ordered the execution of survivors involved in drug trafficking incidents. This has raised serious legal questions, with some analysts suggesting that these actions could amount to murder or even war crimes.

McCarthy asserts that if the allegations are true, such actions would be a violation of U.S. federal law, constituting a war crime. He emphasized, “If this happened as described in the Post report, it was, at best, a war crime under federal law.” The implications of this statement are significant, as it directly challenges the legality of military operations conducted without congressional authorization.

The operation in question was reportedly led by SEAL Team 6 and orchestrated from Fort Bragg, N.C., under the command of Admiral Frank M. “Mitch” Bradley. According to McCarthy, Bradley was directed by Hegseth to ensure the killing of the boat’s operators, under the dubious claim that the survivors remained valid targets.

McCarthy’s arguments are bolstered by legal principles regarding warfare. He articulates that targeting individuals who can no longer fight is strictly prohibited under the laws of war, stating, “It is not permitted… to apply lethal force to those who surrender or who are injured.” This raises urgent questions about Hegseth’s directives and their compliance with established military law.

In a striking endorsement of McCarthy’s views, attorney George Conway shared the essay, adding, “Indeed, it’s a confession and admission of guilt to heinous crimes.” This statement underscores the gravity of the situation and the potential fallout for Hegseth and others involved.

As this story develops, the legal ramifications of Hegseth’s statements could have far-reaching impacts on military conduct and accountability. Observers are closely monitoring how government officials will respond to these allegations and whether further investigations will be initiated.

Stay tuned for updates as this urgent situation unfolds. The military community and the public alike are demanding clarity and justice in response to these serious allegations.