James Snyder Seeks New Trial Ahead of IRS Sentencing on Jan. 14

UPDATE: Former Portage Mayor James Snyder has filed an urgent motion for a new trial on his conviction of obstructing the IRS, just weeks before his sentencing scheduled for January 14, 2024. Snyder argues that the jury in his initial trial was improperly influenced by extensive evidence related to bribery, which the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned, deeming it inadmissible for the tax charge alone.

In a motion filed on October 31, Snyder’s attorney contends that nearly 90% of the trial focused on evidence linked to the bribery count, which has now been dismissed by prosecutors. This substantial focus on unrelated charges raises serious concerns about the fairness of Snyder’s conviction on the tax count. “The court should grant Mr. Snyder a new trial based on prejudicial spillover and retroactive misjoinder,” the filing states.

With the case lingering for nearly nine years, Snyder’s legal battles have drawn significant attention. He was initially indicted on November 17, 2016, on two bribery counts and one for obstructing the IRS. A jury found him guilty on the latter two counts but not guilty on one bribery charge. Snyder was sentenced to 21 months in prison, followed by a year of supervised release, by U.S. District Court Judge Matthew F. Kennelly.

Prosecutors have indicated their intent to proceed with sentencing for the IRS obstruction charge while dismissing the bribery count, which Snyder’s team argues holds him “hostage” until a sufficient penalty is imposed. Prosecutors emphasize the necessity of justice, asserting that Snyder remains “a thoroughly corrupt public official” who has received a $13,000 payment related to corrupt practices.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on June 26 stated that the payment Snyder received was classified as a gratuity rather than a bribe, complicating the government’s position. This decision has far-reaching implications, impacting other high-profile cases, including those involving former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan.

Snyder’s attorney, Andrèa Gambino, criticized the government’s approach, arguing that they are attempting to apply bribery guidelines without a conviction. Gambino’s assertion highlights the complex legal terrain surrounding Snyder’s case and the broader implications for political corruption prosecutions.

As this situation develops, all eyes will be on the U.S. District Court in Hammond as the sentencing date approaches. Observers are eager to see how the court responds to Snyder’s motion and what this could mean for the future of legal accountability in public office.

Stay tuned as we provide updates on this unfolding legal drama that could set significant precedents in the realm of political corruption.